Kelsey Coates, Duquesne University
The Problem: Remember the big fuss over a chemical called tributyltin? Tributyltin (TBT) was used as an antifouling agent in paint on ships’ hulls (De Mora et al., 1997). Antifouling agents prevent marine organisms, such as barnacles, from growing on the bottom and sides of ships. TBT did that and more. In fact, it was banned in the United States in the 1980s when it was found to be a biocide – meaning it unintentionally killed marine plants and animals that were not on the ships’ hulls (De Mora et al., 1997). Long after being banned, TBT is still detectable in marine environments, categorizing it as a ‘legacy’ contaminant. It is also considered an endocrine disrupting chemical (EDC). EDCs are contaminants that mimic hormones in the bodies of people and other organisms, like the mud snail. EDCs can change the effects of hormones which can alter health and physical development.
The eastern mud snail, Tritia obsoleta, is abundant on the mud flats of the estuaries and rivers around Charleston, SC. They live in groups in the same intertidal zones for all 20 – 40 years of their lives. Mud snails use the winter season to reproduce and the summer season to feed and grow. Mud snails are detritivores, meaning they feed on decaying plant and animal matter bound to sediments and in the water column. This makes mud snails especially susceptible to chemical contaminants that associate with sediments, like TBT. One of the endocrine disrupting effects of TBT on mud snails is the induction of imposex, where female snails develop male sex organs to varying degrees (Sternberg et al., 2008). Because mud snails are so sensitive to TBT, elevated exposures lead to more extreme changes and infertility. This can happen to female snails of all ages over time! Mud snails are an ideal alert system for contamination because they stay in the same location all their long lives, spend months of the year solely focused on feeding, and show a spectrum of imposex based on exposure level. If there is any contaminant in the harbor water or sediment – the mud snail is sure to take it up.
TBT and other similarly acting EDCs may be of major concern due to the Charleston Harbor Dredging Project. The dredging project is going to make Charleston harbor the deepest harbor in the east coast (USACE, 2015). Dredging will likely resuspend sediments that had long past settled on the bottoms of waterways. Disturbing the sediment in this way could potentially release legacy contaminants, like TBT, into the water column and along the mud flats. This may increase imposex rates as well as other effects on a wide range of organisms and people. In the body, TBT acts like a hormone that binds to a receptor called the Retinoid X Receptor (RXR) (Iguchi et al., 2007). RXR in the mud snail is expected to come in three different forms called isoforms. My goal this summer is to sequence those isoforms to determine how different chemicals or different concentrations of the same chemical can change the relative levels of the RXR isoforms. By accomplishing this goal, mud snails can be used in the future to detect contaminants that affect marine organisms because their pattern of isoform expression might suggest which contaminants are present in the environment where they live.
Imposex is a concern for mud snails because interference with female snails’ sex organs can lead to infertility. Also, mud snails inhabit the same areas as crabs and juvenile fish. If crabs and small fish become contaminated, the larger fish and birds that prey on them would become contaminated in higher levels by the process of biomagnification. This could limit the amount and types of fish that humans can eat and sell which would disrupt the local marine economy. If the contaminants go undetected, it could lead to human reproductive and other health disorders. It is important to study imposex for the sake of all marine species and humans that use the harbor for food, shelter, and recreation.
I would like to acknowledge Dr. Demetri Spyropoulos, Edwina Mathis, Dr. Bob Podolsky, The Fort Johnson REU Program, The Hollings Marine Lab, NOAA, and The Grice Marine Lab. This research was supported by the Fort Johnson REU Program, NSF DBI-1757899.
- de Mora, S. J., and E. Pelletier. “Environmental Tributyltin Research: Past, Present, Future.” Environmental Technology 18, no. 12 (1997/12/01): 1169-77.
- Sternberg, Robin M., Andrew K. Hotchkiss, and Gerald A. LeBlanc. “Synchronized Expression of Retinoid X Receptor Mrna with Reproductive Tract Recrudescence in an Imposex-Susceptible Mollusc.” Environmental Science & Technology 42, no. 4 (2008/02/01): 1345-51.
- Iguchi, Taisen, Yoshinao Katsu, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hajime Watanabe, Bruce Blumberg, and Yasuhiko Ohta. “Endocrine Disrupting Organotin Compounds Are Potent Inducers of Imposex in Gastropods and Adipogenesis in Vertebrates.” Molecular and Cellular Toxicology, Vol. 3, (2007): 1-10
- US Army Corps of Engineers. “Charleston Harbor Post 45 Final Integrated Feasibility Report/Environmental Impact Statement.” (2015/06)